It is a sad commentary on our county government!
Saturday, August 29, 2015
Supreme Court Seals Sexual Expicit Document from the Public View
Is it possible that a public official could be accused of such filthy activity while he was serving as an assistant prosecutor? Apparently, the WV Supreme Court doesn't want anyone viewing exhibits that were submitted and made a part of the public domain!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
the very first rule of lawyers is "to create work for themselves".
ReplyDeletethats exactly what the supremes have done in this document.
........"all parties are hereby ordered to RESUBMIT documents with names redacted and substituted with initials".
so now all the scumbag lawyers get to review their prior "work product" (i,e. the loco poco porn misadventures of Ol Jump n Jive JL) and remove any and all names of the "sexual victims" and GENERATE NEW BILLABLE HOURS by creating new documents to resubmit that contain only initials of the victims.
sadly, the taxpayers are most likely on the hook for the wv bar odc resubmissions.
ironically........and on the upside.......... Ol JL will get a fresh new montlhy bill from his counselor in his efforts to review and resubmit documents to the wv supreme court.
Par for the course, Sir Rotten had a sweet deal, in the name of protecting the victims that the prosecutor and judge went along with.
DeleteHad this deal not been worked out chances are Rotten would be serving life.
So often the justice system protects its own and leave or children and wife's out in the cold to become prey for the wolf pack.
The Road Runner...
I am curious who is paying the bill and will the pokey insurance be paying out for yet again another round of sex related cival actions again related to our fine upstanding. actions of our former enforcer of laws .
DeleteI'm guessing the county's premiums are on the way up.
Most people tell thier daughters if they need help find a cop , I wonder how many around here tell that to thier daughters.,
ReplyDelete