So,it looks as if the PARTIES to this shindig are bound by the confidentiality......but if it LEAKED, and then got PUBLISHED, I do not see that anyone would have committed any crime.
looks like its time for the fat man to put the new supreme court ruling to the test......TIME FOR A FOIA ON SIR ROTTEN'S RECORDS!!! this could be precedent setting in the entire state- the ruling applies to state police, but should also logically apply to local police too.
honestly, at this point- for sir rotten- what is there left to hide??? there is nothing left for embarrassment of sir rotten........or is there??? everybody knows he is guilty of his crimes and is in prison. what is the harm in making his employment records public??? the only thing left to hide could be EVIDENCE that would result in the payout of millions of dollars.......and documents that establish a timeline of knowledge on jonese's part. or quite possibly, glowing and sugar coated annual performance reviews that jonese doled out to sir rotten to lay the foundation for him to be the future sheriff of the loco poco forest.
you can ding dang darn well bet that the insurance companies are gonna wanna know- and demand- whats in those files before they make their payouts and settlements.
remember the comments (and recent re-postings) from the E-TATER in 2009, where folks heard on the scanner that jonese had "cracked the whip" on rotten and had removed him from night patrol to help eliminate his sexual escapades??? remember that this only lasted for a few weeks...........before jonese had sir rotten back on night prowling duties......and folks heard him on the scanners. remember the news accounts and testimony that AT LEAST TWO (2) women were victimized after jonese had warned rotten to cease spilling his seed all over the county??? remember the donna price odc hearings whereby witnesses testified that jonese indicated that he knew that "totten was having sex all over the courthouse"???
the E-TATER may very well be rising from the grave, and once again be utilized and presented in a court of law to help paint the picture of the sir rotten and jonese timeline of events. its no wonder why jonese fabricated and participated in the midnight raid and arrest at the fat man's house. illegally seizing evidence that could be used against him.......and destroy it......in attempts to protect himself and the pcsd reign of terror.....while taking a political hit against those that speak out to expose the truth........and con the citizens that he and the pcsd are just "doing their jobs to protect the public"............... from electronic school records.
again, someone needs to raise this issue at the next CC meeting. rotten's records are property of the county........paid for and produced by the taxpayers. the legal precedent and case law has been set, stated, and ruled upon by the wv supreme court. the only thing left to do to produce these documents is to file a freedom of information act.
people also need to demand the production of the evidence in the case as it progresses. the fbi, state police, and special prosecutor are already in possession of sir rotten's iphone and the backseat boogie homemade videos he recorded on it.
They are looking to see if totten was reprimanded in any way for his behavior towards the huge amount of female snitch's he used or public complaints. You have to ask would any of our Sheriffs do that ? Alkire verbally reprimanded him but did he record it? Did Dave record any of the complains he had gotten if not way not. .
is it totten`s personal file that needs protecting or rather jonese that they need to protect ?????? why rowe on this case ,time for some new rulings ?????? ,like in a different county,with a different judge ..........
Looks like leysorek loses another one: For the foregoing reasons, we find no error in the decision of the Circuit Court of Pocahontas County and affirm the circuit court’s October 18, 2013, order which directed the following judgments: (1) a judgment against Petitioner Bernier for $49 in unpaid “green box” fees for 2006, plus $150 in statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest; (2) a judgment against Petitioner Leyzorek for $498 in unpaid “green box” fees for 2001 through 2006, plus $900 in statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest; and (3) a judgment against Petitioner Elza for $498 in unpaid “green box” fees for 2001 through 2006, plus $900 in statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest
all these shit house lawyer self representing cases have gone no where .....just a waste of time,it is time to find some real lawyers ,or just lose ........sad to say .....
another reason for the raid on house where the feared alderman gang hangout was as a repay for helping get runny muck in trouble before he became sheriff and was given the title of chief ......... runny muck had a mining company for the purpose of selling landscaping river rock on pallets .......problem was chief no got surface mining permit so he blamed reverend alderman for turning confidential informant ( dropping a dime on his ass ) so after a court injunction mining company kaput ! that is how our sheriff is ,like a little kid that uses his job to carry out grudges ,which actually dreamed up by a man who needs some intense psychotherapy ......... he has used that job for nothing more than screwing up and getting even with people who appose him .........the problems that face this county presently and in the future cannot be fixed with the sheriff ,his friends ,or his out of touch war on crime ....... a war with no reason or direction ....... really what do we have to show for his six years so far ........well on second thought he did tie up norman for a while and now he is knuckling down on poor farrel kelly ......so other than that he heap big pile of buffalo chips ........ his payed c.i. `s all washed out in court .....showed up to high to testify,juries do not like to hear prosecution witness `s slur their words or nod off .......his take on gang busters pocahontas county went like him ,nowhere fast ,you know run a muck .........ha ha !!
if beer bong bob got fired by geriatric gene, martin can now;
1. open up a private practice and supervise donna price and her legal efforts for the next 3 years. 2. represent cocky clifton in the next few months when new felony counts are announced. 3. open up a tourism business on his new farm and sell tickets for folks to visit his pet pig.
So,it looks as if the PARTIES to this shindig are bound by the confidentiality......but if it LEAKED, and then got PUBLISHED, I do not see that anyone would have committed any crime.
ReplyDeletelooks like its time for the fat man to put the new supreme court ruling to the test......TIME FOR A FOIA ON SIR ROTTEN'S RECORDS!!!
ReplyDeletethis could be precedent setting in the entire state- the ruling applies to state police, but should also logically apply to local police too.
honestly, at this point- for sir rotten- what is there left to hide???
ReplyDeletethere is nothing left for embarrassment of sir rotten........or is there???
everybody knows he is guilty of his crimes and is in prison.
what is the harm in making his employment records public???
the only thing left to hide could be EVIDENCE that would result in the payout of millions of dollars.......and documents that establish a timeline of knowledge on jonese's part.
or quite possibly, glowing and sugar coated annual performance reviews that jonese doled out to sir rotten to lay the foundation for him to be the future sheriff of the loco poco forest.
you can ding dang darn well bet that the insurance companies are gonna wanna know- and demand- whats in those files before they make their payouts and settlements.
remember the comments (and recent re-postings) from the E-TATER in 2009, where folks heard on the scanner that jonese had "cracked the whip" on rotten and had removed him from night patrol to help eliminate his sexual escapades???
ReplyDeleteremember that this only lasted for a few weeks...........before jonese had sir rotten back on night prowling duties......and folks heard him on the scanners.
remember the news accounts and testimony that AT LEAST TWO (2) women were victimized after jonese had warned rotten to cease spilling his seed all over the county???
remember the donna price odc hearings whereby witnesses testified that jonese indicated that he knew that "totten was having sex all over the courthouse"???
the E-TATER may very well be rising from the grave, and once again be utilized and presented in a court of law to help paint the picture of the sir rotten and jonese timeline of events.
its no wonder why jonese fabricated and participated in the midnight raid and arrest at the fat man's house.
illegally seizing evidence that could be used against him.......and destroy it......in attempts to protect himself and the pcsd reign of terror.....while taking a political hit against those that speak out to expose the truth........and con the citizens that he and the pcsd are just "doing their jobs to protect the public"............... from electronic school records.
again, someone needs to raise this issue at the next CC meeting.
ReplyDeleterotten's records are property of the county........paid for and produced by the taxpayers.
the legal precedent and case law has been set, stated, and ruled upon by the wv supreme court.
the only thing left to do to produce these documents is to file a freedom of information act.
people also need to demand the production of the evidence in the case as it progresses.
ReplyDeletethe fbi, state police, and special prosecutor are already in possession of sir rotten's iphone and the backseat boogie homemade videos he recorded on it.
They are looking to see if totten was reprimanded in any way for his behavior towards the huge amount of female snitch's he used or public complaints.
ReplyDeleteYou have to ask would any of our Sheriffs do that ?
Alkire verbally reprimanded him but did he record it?
Did Dave record any of the complains he had gotten if not way not. .
The Road Runner...
alkire is also on the witness list.
Deletenot sure if sr or jr- should be both as each has info on rotten.
is it totten`s personal file that needs protecting or rather jonese that they need to protect ?????? why rowe on this case ,time for some new rulings ?????? ,like in a different county,with a different judge ..........
ReplyDeleteLooks like leysorek loses another one:
ReplyDeleteFor the foregoing reasons, we find no error in the decision of the Circuit Court of
Pocahontas County and affirm the circuit court’s October 18, 2013, order which directed the
following judgments: (1) a judgment against Petitioner Bernier for $49 in unpaid “green box” fees
for 2006, plus $150 in statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest; (2) a
judgment against Petitioner Leyzorek for $498 in unpaid “green box” fees for 2001 through 2006,
plus $900 in statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest; and (3) a judgment
against Petitioner Elza for $498 in unpaid “green box” fees for 2001 through 2006, plus $900 in
statutory penalties, plus costs and pre- and post-judgment interest
all these shit house lawyer self representing cases have gone no where .....just a waste of time,it is time to find some real lawyers ,or just lose ........sad to say .....
ReplyDeleteanother reason for the raid on house where the feared alderman gang hangout was as a repay for helping get runny muck in trouble before he became sheriff and was given the title of chief ......... runny muck had a mining company for the purpose of selling landscaping river rock on pallets .......problem was chief no got surface mining permit so he blamed reverend alderman for turning confidential informant ( dropping a dime on his ass ) so after a court injunction mining company kaput ! that is how our sheriff is ,like a little kid that uses his job to carry out grudges ,which actually dreamed up by a man who needs some intense psychotherapy ......... he has used that job for nothing more than screwing up and getting even with people who appose him .........the problems that face this county presently and in the future cannot be fixed with the sheriff ,his friends ,or his out of touch war on crime ....... a war with no reason or direction ....... really what do we have to show for his six years so far ........well on second thought he did tie up norman for a while and now he is knuckling down on poor farrel kelly ......so other than that he heap big pile of buffalo chips ........ his payed c.i. `s all washed out in court .....showed up to high to testify,juries do not like to hear prosecution witness `s slur their words or nod off .......his take on gang busters pocahontas county went like him ,nowhere fast ,you know run a muck .........ha ha !!
ReplyDeletebeer can was fired by the oldtimer today; i'm surprised you don't know this (it pays to have a courthouse mole)
ReplyDeleteif beer bong bob got fired by geriatric gene, martin can now;
Delete1. open up a private practice and supervise donna price and her legal efforts for the next 3 years.
2. represent cocky clifton in the next few months when new felony counts are announced.
3. open up a tourism business on his new farm and sell tickets for folks to visit his pet pig.
THE HEARING FOR SIR ROTTEN'S "MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE" IS JULY 25, 11 AM AT THE LOCO POCO COURTHOUSE.
ReplyDelete